Vision of Britain | 1921 Census: County Report

1921 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1921: England and Wales: Series of County Parts. County of Norfolk), Table 3 : " Population, Acreage, Private Families and Dwellings".

Show top level table	Repton	Show Derbyshire AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Area in Statute Acres (Land and Inland Water) [1]	Total Population					Private Families and Dwellings
		1911	1921				Private Families [7]	Population in Private Families [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Rooms per Person [11]
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private Families [7]	Population in Private Families [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Rooms per Person [11]
Repton RD Total	54,273	16,133	16,500	8,345	8,155	-	3,514	-	3,419	18,621	-
Calke CP/AP	682	54	55	22	33	-	9	-	9	93	-
Hartshorne CP/AP	2,626	1,384	1,515	803	712	-	320	-	311	1,503	-
Netherseal CP	2,612	704	684	345	339	-	170	-	167	867	-
Overseal CP	1,182	1,809	2,033	1,069	964	-	415	-	403	2,202	-
Smisby CP/AP	1,270	319	343	168	175	-	80	-	76	434	-
Ticknall CP/AP	2,639	734	761	391	370	-	187	-	185	917	-
Woodville CP	464	2,871	3,146	1,600	1,546	-	671	-	637	3,161	-
Ash Hmlt/CP	703	77	126	79	47	-	14	-	14	84	-
Barton Blount CP/AP	1,201	47	54	29	25	-	10	-	10	105	-
Bearwardcote CP/Tn	463	43	36	20	16	-	7	-	7	51	-
Bretby CP/Ch	2,317	414	352	176	176	-	92	-	88	503	-
Burnaston CP/Tn	979	239	204	106	98	-	48	-	48	254	-
Caldwell CP/Hmlt	1,055	150	132	67	65	-	26	-	26	184	-
Castle Gresley CP/Hmlt	614	1,353	1,492	758	734	-	322	-	307	1,571	-
Catton Tn/CP	1,099	111	91	44	47	-	18	-	18	127	-
Church Broughton AP/CP	2,216	451	429	224	205	-	111	-	108	560	-
Coton in the Elms CP/Tn	1,192	498	471	243	228	-	105	-	105	469	-
Dalbury Lees CP/AP	1,192	142	172	87	85	-	39	-	38	242	-
Drakelow CP/Tn	1,884	99	115	51	64	-	24	-	24	192	-
Egginton CP/AP	2,406	431	430	202	228	-	94	-	94	512	-
Etwall AP/CP	2,081	694	721	347	374	-	169	-	168	857	-
Findern Ch/CP	1,679	360	381	184	197	-	99	-	93	536	-
Foremark AP/CP	1,207	57	49	22	27	-	12	-	12	105	-
Foston and Scropton Tn/CP	2,850	636	692	328	364	-	146	-	141	815	-
Hatton CP/Tn	874	900	926	463	463	-	214	-	207	1,071	-
Hilton Tn/CP	1,835	816	809	415	394	-	192	-	192	973	-
Hoon CP/Tn	789	52	40	19	21	-	7	-	7	77	-
Ingleby CP/Tn	925	84	98	55	43	-	21	-	21	119	-
Linton CP/Tn	966	1,103	1,191	647	544	-	267	-	235	1,066	-
Lullington AP/CP	1,822	226	208	117	91	-	44	-	44	243	-
Marston on Dove CP/AP	1,009	87	75	40	35	-	16	-	16	118	-
Mickleover CP/AP	2,422	2,389	2,573	1,226	1,347	-	439	-	426	2,363	-
Newton Solney AP/CP	1,865	476	433	207	226	-	102	-	102	583	-
Osleton and Thurvaston CP/Tn	1,745	298	278	149	129	-	65	-	65	419	-
Radbourne AP/CP	2,183	191	187	90	97	-	45	-	45	299	-
Repton CP/AP	4,042	1,858	1,929	1,082	847	-	338	-	336	1,762	-
Rosliston CP/Ch	1,220	418	467	238	229	-	97	-	96	448	-
Sutton on the Hill AP/CP	880	112	106	50	56	-	26	-	26	181	-
Trusley AP/CP	1,086	113	98	49	49	-	19	-	19	131	-
Twyford and Stenson CP/Ch	1,770	167	164	78	86	-	35	-	35	204	-
Walton upon Trent AP/CP	2,377	400	340	156	184	-	89	-	89	530	-
Willington CP/AP	1,325	641	631	297	334	-	162	-	157	867	-

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Repton RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1921
Rate of Population Change (% over previous 10 years)	1921

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.